Materials as Code
Versioned recipes, experiment data, and process twins to ship faster.
Materials as Code
Treat materials like software: versioned, testable, and shipped faster with data.
The idea
We can search composition space with AI the way we search design space with code. Hypothesize, simulate, synthesize, test, learn. Loop again.
Why it matters
- Battery, alloy, and polymer cycles move from years to months.
- Process + recipe become a defendable advantage, not just the part.
Pattern
- Data layer: structured experiment records; units, uncertainty, lineage.
- Model layer: surrogate models (physics + ML) with cross-validation.
- Design loop: propose → screen → select → synthesize → test.
- Process twin: link recipe steps to outcomes; control for drift.
- Governance: version every recipe; lock release candidates.
First 30–60 days
- Pick one property to improve (e.g., cycle life, toughness, temp window).
- Consolidate past experiments into a tidy dataset; fix units and IDs.
- Train a baseline model; run a small Bayesian design-of-experiments.
- Execute 3–5 builds; capture full metadata; update the model.
Signals / KPIs
- Cycle time per design loop; % hits vs. baselines; variance explained (R²).
- Cost per validated improvement; scrap/rework rate; reproducibility.
Risks & mitigations
- Bad data: enforce templates; units; instrument calibration logs.
- Overfit models: holdout sets; external validation; ablation checks.
- Scale-up gaps: include process parameters early; pilot at two scales.